Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Taliban threat could skew Pakistan election result

In this Thursday, Feb. 21, 2013, photo, Pakistani student Hazratullah Khan, 14, who was injured in a car bombing on December 17, 2012, as he was on his way home from school, reacts from pain while medical staff measure the size of his limb, at the Private Therapy Complex in Peshawar, Pakistan. Moderate politicians from some of Pakistan?s most violent areas are defying the threat of violence to run in upcoming nationwide elections, but they?re increasingly turning to social media and phone calls that allow them to campaign from a distance. (AP Photo/Muhammed Muheisen)

In this Thursday, Feb. 21, 2013, photo, Pakistani student Hazratullah Khan, 14, who was injured in a car bombing on December 17, 2012, as he was on his way home from school, reacts from pain while medical staff measure the size of his limb, at the Private Therapy Complex in Peshawar, Pakistan. Moderate politicians from some of Pakistan?s most violent areas are defying the threat of violence to run in upcoming nationwide elections, but they?re increasingly turning to social media and phone calls that allow them to campaign from a distance. (AP Photo/Muhammed Muheisen)

In this Thursday, April 11, 2013, photo, Pakistani daily laborer, Wakeel Mohammed, 38, who fled Pakistan's tribal region, due to fighting between the Taliban and the army, and took refuge in Islamabad, sits on a roadside with his daughter Halimah, 1, sitting on his lap and his relative Khadijah, 7, right, near their home, in a poor neighborhood on the outskirts of Islamabad, Pakistan. Moderate politicians from some of Pakistan?s most violent areas are defying the threat of violence to run in upcoming nationwide elections, but they?re increasingly turning to social media and phone calls that allow them to campaign from a distance. (AP Photo/Muhammed Muheisen)

In this Tuesday, April 16, 2013 photo, Maulana Jalil Jan, second right, a candidate of Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam, is surrounded by supporters while touring a market in Peshawar, Pakistan. Moderate politicians from some of Pakistan?s most violent areas are defying the threat of violence to run in upcoming nationwide elections, but they?re increasingly turning to social media and phone calls that allow them to campaign from a distance. (AP Photo/Mohammad Sajjad)

In this Tuesday, April 16, 2013, photo, Pakistani politician Mian Iftikhar Hussain, right, looks at a documentary film about his son, who was gunned down by Taliban militants, at his office in Peshawar, Pakistan. Moderate politicians from some of Pakistan?s most violent areas are defying the threat of violence to run in upcoming nationwide elections, but they?re increasingly turning to social media and phone calls that allow them to campaign from a distance. (AP Photo/Mohammad Sajjad)

In this Monday, March 18, 2013, photo, an elderly Pakistani, Gul Nabi, 70, who fled Pakistan's tribal area of Bajur in 2009, due to fighting between the Taliban and the army, and took refuge in Islamabad, sits on a roadside near his home with his granddaughter Shailala, a year and a half, sleeping on his lap, on the outskirts of Islamabad, Pakistan. Moderate politicians from some of Pakistan?s most violent areas are defying the threat of violence to run in upcoming nationwide elections, but they?re increasingly turning to social media and phone calls that allow them to campaign from a distance. (AP Photo/Muhammed Muheisen)

(AP) ? Moderate politicians from some of Pakistan's most violent areas are risking the threat of Taliban attack to run in upcoming nationwide elections, but they are increasingly being forced to rely on social media, phone calls and even short documentaries that allow them to campaign at a distance.

That could give hard-line Islamic candidates and Taliban supporters an advantage as they're able to stump for votes and hold large public rallies that are a traditional hallmark of elections in the country but are extremely vulnerable to attacks.

One of the most serious attacks occurred Tuesday, when a suicide bomber blew himself up outside a meeting of the secular Awami National Party in the northwestern city of Peshawar, killing 16 people. The Taliban said the target of the attack was Haroon Ahmad Bilour, whose father, a senior party leader, was killed in a suicide bombing in Peshawar in December. He escaped unscathed, but his uncle, Ghulam Ahmad Bilour, suffered minor injuries.

As he was being treated at the hospital, the uncle vowed that he and other party candidates would not withdraw from the election despite the death threats. With his trousers soaked in blood, he walked among the hospital beds to comfort crying victims and told them, "We are fighting a war for Pakistan's survival."

Hours earlier, a candidate from one of the Islamic parties, Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam, campaigned freely in his constituency in a different part of Peshawar, the capital of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. Maulana Jalil Jan's supporters showered him with rose petals as he walked unguarded from shop to shop down narrow, crowded lanes to ask for votes. He bristled at any suggestion that the Taliban were terrorists and blamed attacks in the country on foreign agents seeking to "malign religious leaders, all bearded people." He pointed out that the word Taliban simply means a student in an Islamic school.

"There is a difference between the Taliban and terrorists," said Jan.

Faced with the Taliban threat, parties have had to get more creative in their campaigning for the May 11 vote. Members of the Awami National Party and other secular political parties specifically targeted by the Pakistani Taliban have stepped up their use of Facebook and Twitter as well as phone calls and advertisements.

Analysts and secular party candidates fear that the danger could skew election results in favor of hard-line Islamic parties and others who refuse to speak out strongly against the Taliban. Their candidates are able to campaign with much less fear of being attacked, and the concern is this could lead to national and provincial governments inclined to take a softer position toward the militants.

"If you tie my hands, and you want me to fight, I can't," said Mian Iftikhar Hussain, a candidate from the Awami National Party, sitting in his heavily guarded office in Peshawar.

Hussain is running for a provincial assembly seat in the town of Pabbi, which is only 20 kilometers (12 miles) from Peshawar, but it is too dangerous for him to campaign there in person. To get around the danger, Hussain produced a short documentary that highlights development work he has brought to Pabbi and chronicles the sad loss of his only son, who was gunned down by Taliban militants in 2010.

The documentary shows Hussain standing in prayer over the freshly dug grave of his son as a heartfelt poem he wrote in the young man's memory is sung out in mournful tones: "I never knew the enemy could reach my home, my heart, my love would disappear in a grave." He distributes it on DVDs to voters in Pabbi and plans to show the short film there using a couple of big projectors.

Hussain was attacked himself by a suicide bomber at his son's funeral in Pabbi. He survived, but seven other people were killed, including two of his close relatives.

The politician's eyes teared up as he watched the images of his son's grave in the documentary. The film asks his constituents to "vote for those who are sacrificing their lives to save you and your children from terrorists."

It's not only the top Islamic parties like Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam and Jamaat-e-Islami that seem to have been spared by the Taliban in the run-up to the election, but also mainstream parties perceived to take a softer stance on militancy, such as the Pakistan Muslim League-N, which is favored to come out on top in the election, and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, which is headed by former cricket star Imran Khan. They have all safely held public rallies attended by thousands of people in recent weeks.

These parties have all pushed for peace negotiations with the Taliban instead of military offensives, and the militant group recently said talks should be mediated by the leaders of the top two Islamic parties and the Pakistan Muslim League-N. The parties that have been targeted by the Taliban have also called for peace negotiations, but have demanded the militants put down their weapons and endorse the constitution first and have vowed to continue fighting them until that happens. The Taliban have rejected these conditions.

"This is not a level playing field," Awami National Party leader Afrasiab Khattak said.

The Pakistani Taliban have been waging a bloody insurgency in Pakistan for years to enforce Islamic law in the country and to break the government's alliance with the United States in fighting militants. They have killed thousands of civilians and security personnel in scores of gun and bomb attacks.

The group's main sanctuaries are in the rugged northwest along the Afghan border, including the semiautonomous tribal region and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The Taliban have also established a significant presence in the southern city of Karachi and have stepped up attacks there.

The militant group issued audio and video messages last month warning people to stay away from rallies held by the Awami National Party and two other secular parties that have supported army offensives against the militants in the northwest: the Pakistan People's Party, which led the most recent government, and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement, which controls Karachi.

The Taliban have carried out at least 10 attacks against candidates and party workers, mainly those in the Awami National Party. The attacks have killed at least 18 people, including a candidate for the Muttahida Qaumi Movement. Many other candidates have been wounded, including five from the Awami National Party.

"This is a clear attempt by the so-called 'non-state actors' to oust and defeat moderate parties," said Raza Rumi, a political analyst who runs the Jinnah Institute think tank in Islamabad. "This can't be a fair and free election."

The Awami National Party has closed over 50 of its election offices in recent months, mainly in Karachi and Peshawar, because of the threat of attack. The Muttahida Qaumi Movement has stopped holding the massive public rallies that it is known for in Karachi. The Pakistan People's Party had to cancel a large event in southern Sindh province at the beginning of April that was meant to mark the start of its campaign because of security reasons.

Khattak, the Awami National Party leader, called on all political parties to come forward and condemn the attacks on candidates. Many have remained silent or have refused to name the Pakistani Taliban, either for ideological reasons or out of fear of being targeted themselves.

"You have to decide whether you are with the terrorists or with the people," Khattak said.

____

Associated Press writer Riaz Khan contributed to this report.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/cae69a7523db45408eeb2b3a98c0c9c5/Article_2013-04-21-Pakistan-Taliban%20Election%20Threat/id-d7b263c6f6d549f5bd75c89c807c7e4d

lisa vanderpump Dancing With the Stars 2013 NIT Bracket March Madness 2013 bracket March Madness 2013 selection sunday NIT Tournament

Monday, April 22, 2013

Social stress and the inflamed brain

Apr. 21, 2013 ? Depression is the leading cause of disability with more than 350 million people globally affected by this disease. In addition to debilitating consequences on mental health, depression predisposes an individual to physiological disease such as heart disease, and conversely heart disease increases the risk of depression. According to the World Health Organization by the year 2020 heart disease and depression will be the number one and number two leading causes of disability in developed countries. While the co-occurrence of these disorders is well recognized, an understanding of the underlying mechanisms that lead to this relationship are lacking.

Dr. Susan K. Wood, a Research Associate at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, investigates brain-related biomarkers for depression-heart disease comorbidity. She uses a rodent model of social stress likened to bullying in people that she has found to produce depressive-like behaviors and dysfunctional cardiovascular changes in a susceptible subset of rodents. Her previous work highlighted a role for the stress-related neurohormone corticotropin-releasing factor in rendering an individual vulnerable to stress-induced depression and heart disease. Intrigued by what other biomarkers may be distinct her latest study is the first to identify gene and protein expression differences in the brains of rodents that are either vulnerable or resilient to developing stress-induced depressive-like behaviors and cardiovascular dysfunction.

The study, conducted in male rats, compared expression of 88 genes involved in signaling within the brain between socially stressed and non-stressed rats. It revealed more than 35 genes in stressed rats that had altered expression compared with non-stressed controls. Many of the genes that were differentially expressed were related to inflammation. Follow-up studies measuring protein levels revealed that Interleukin-1? and Monocyte chemotactic protein-1, inflammatory markers known to play a role in depression and heart disease, were suppressed in the brains of the resilient subset of rats and Interleukin-1? was increased in the vulnerable group. Dr. Wood measured the gene and protein levels under resting conditions 24 hours after just 5 daily 30-minute exposures to social stress.

The identification of factors in the brain that distinguish susceptibility and resiliency to depression and heart disease comorbidity would be a major advance in predicting, preventing and treating these disorders. Dr. Wood is continuing these studies as an Assistant Professor at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine with the hope that these findings will uncover new targets to treat the mind and body.

Her findings will be presented April 21st, 2013 during Experimental Biology 2013 in Boston, MA.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/mind_brain/mental_health/~3/bG-TTU4qHd8/130421153839.htm

2012 grammys foo fighters nikki minaj album of the year grammy red carpet grammy award winners the band perry

Witherspoon 'deeply embarrassed' after arrest

ATLANTA (AP) ? Reese Witherspoon is "deeply embarrassed" about what she said to police officers after she and her husband were arrested during a traffic stop in Atlanta.

The Oscar-winning actress released a statement late Sunday apologizing for her behavior to police that began when her husband, Hollywood agent Jim Toth, was arrested early Friday for driving under the influence of alcohol.

"Do you know my name?" Witherspoon is quoted as saying in a state trooper's report. She also said: "You're about to find out who I am" and "You're about to be on national news," according to the report.

"I clearly had one drink too many and I am deeply embarrassed about the things I said," Witherspoon said. "It was definitely a scary situation and I was frightened for my husband, but that is no excuse. I was disrespectful to the officer who was just doing his job. The words I used that night definitely do not reflect who I am. I have nothing but respect for the police and I'm very sorry for my behavior."

Witherspoon said she can't comment further "out of respect" for the pending case, and her publicist, Meredith O'Sullivan Wasson, offered no other details.

The 37-year-old actress was arrested on a municipal charge of disorderly conduct early Friday after a state trooper said she wouldn't stay in the car while Toth was given a field sobriety test. She was released from jail after the Friday morning arrest and was in New York on Sunday night for the premiere of her new film, "Mud." She posed for cameras on the red carpet but did not stop to talk to reporters.

The trooper noticed the car driven by her husband wasn't staying in its lane early Friday morning, so he initiated a traffic stop. He reported that Toth had droopy eyelids, watery, bloodshot eyes, and his breath smelled strongly of alcohol.

Toth told the trooper he'd had a drink, which Witherspoon said was consumed at a restaurant two hours before the traffic stop, the trooper writes.

Before the field sobriety test began, Witherspoon got out of the car, was told to get back in and obeyed, the report said. After the "Walk the Line" star got out a second time, the trooper said he warned her that she would be arrested if she left the car again.

As the test continued, "Mrs. Witherspoon began to hang out the window and say that she did not believe that I was a real police officer. I told Mrs. Witherspoon to sit on her butt and be quiet," Trooper First Class J. Pyland writes.

Toth, 42, was then placed under arrest. He was charged with driving under the influence and failure to maintain the lane.

At that point, the report says, Witherspoon got out and asked the trooper what was going on. After being told to return to the car, she "stated that she was a 'US Citizen' and that she was allowed to 'stand on American ground,'" the report states.

The trooper then began to arrest Witherspoon. The report says Witherspoon was resistant at first but was calmed down by her husband.

Toth and Witherspoon were then taken to jail.

News of the arrest broke shortly before Witherspoon arrived on the "Mud" red carpet.

"I can't say anything because I don't know," said director Jeff Nichols. "I literally ? the first guy on the press line to say something was the first time I heard about it so I gotta go figure it out."

Matthew McConaughey, who plays the lead role in "Mud" and is represented by Toth, said "I'm not going to comment on that because it's too fresh."

__

AP writers Sandy Cohen in Los Angeles and Lauri Neff in New York contributed to this report.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/witherspoon-deeply-embarrassed-arrest-053727827.html

madmen james cameron liam hemsworth miss canada justin bieber boyfriend marianas trench camille grammer

Sharks Dive Deep Under Full Moon

A full moon and warm waters may send some sharks diving deep, according to a new study.

Over the course of nearly three years, researchers from Australia observed 39 mostly female gray reef sharks (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) living near coral reefs in Palau, Micronesia, east of the Philippines.

In the winter, the sharks stayed closer to the surface, at an average depth of 115 feet (35 meters), where water was consistently warmer, the team found. Meanwhile, the sharks plunged deeper when seasonal temperatures started rising in the spring, averaging depths of 200 feet (60 meters). [On the Brink: A Gallery of Wild Sharks]

The sharks also changed their behavior in sync with the lunar cycle, diving deeper during the full moon but sticking to the shallows with the new moon. Previous tagging studies showed that other open-water predators ? including swordfish, yellowfin and big eye tuna ? also go to greater depths as the lunar cycle progresses. This suggests the moon's brightness might sway the movements of many big fish.

And the sun seemed to have an effect, too; the sharks hit their greatest depths at midday when the most sunlight broke through the water column, and they began floating back up to the surface in the afternoon.

"This matches how light changes on the reef during the day," Gabriel Vianna, of the University of Western Australia, said in a statement. "To our knowledge, this is the first time such patterns have been observed in detail for reef sharks."

The researchers believe tendencies might help gray reef sharks conserve energy, find food and possibly avoid bigger sharks. Better knowledge of sharks' swimming patterns might save the animals from becoming the accidental catch of fishers.

"In places such as Palau, which relies heavily on marine tourism and where sharks are a major tourist attraction worth $18 million a year, the fishing of a few dozen sharks from popular dive sites could have a very negative impact on the national economy," Vianna explained. "This is potentially a big concern, because it could happen in just a couple of days."

Gray reef sharks are quite common and typically not of concern to conservationists. But shark populations have been dropping worldwide. A report out this year found that 100 million sharks are killed each year and many species are threatened due to overfishing. After a vote by conservationists last month, the international trade of five different sharks is set to be regulated under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). The species that will get new protections are heavily targeted by the shark-finning industry.

The new findings were detailed online April 10 in the journal PLOS ONE.

Follow Megan Gannon on Twitter and Google+. Follow us @livescience, Facebook & Google+. Original article on LiveScience.com.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/sharks-dive-deep-under-full-moon-130127105.html

Nick Foles Auguste Rodin Breaking Amish Indianapolis explosion mike brown bcs rankings jay cutler

Whoops, CBS Got Twitter-Hacked And Spat Out Virus-y Links (Update: There's More!)

Twitter hacks are an unfortunate reality of everyday social media life. Today, it was CBS's 60 Minutes, 48 Hours, and CBS Denver accounts that took the hit and started dishing out some linkbait-y tweets with a virus-laiden garnish. Careful what you click. More »
    


Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/EtQPOWFKq_c/whoops-some-cbs-twitter-accounts-got-hacked-and-spat-out-virus+y-links

rand paul Iron Man 3 Lauren Silberman Sim City Manchester United Alvin Lee mila kunis

Saturday, April 13, 2013

Around the Web?

TGIF! Get the weekend started right with these reads: More and more moms practicing Lotus births by never cutting the umbilical cord — New York Post Working moms give their children a chance at explaining their job duties — iVillage Tips and tricks on bringing home baby no. 2 — Happy Healthy Mom PHOTOS: Adorable [...]

Source: http://feeds.celebritybabies.com/~r/celebrity-babies/~3/oE-FAjhMIB0/

nfl nfl lil wayne wes welker ides of march cnn pi

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

NAB 2013 wrap-up: Sony 4K TVs, Red, Blackmagic, Thunderbolt and more!

DNP  NAB 2013 wrapup

The National Association of Broadcasters' annual event in Vegas may not offer the same blitz of high-profile gadgets as CES, but this show is hardly a quiet one. In fact, the excitement kicked off before the floor even opened, with Sony announcing pricing for its 55- and 65-inch 4K TVs. When 25 grand is the norm for these high-end sets, MSRPs of $5,000 and $7,000 seem downright budget-friendly. Blackmagic's $995 Pocket Cinema Camera also made headlines for its value proposition, with a Super-16 Cinema sensor, 13 stops of dynamic range and a Micro Four Thirds lens mount rounding out a very solid spec list.

Our favorite booth, however, belonged to Red. The company was performing its Dragon upgrade on-site, giving showgoers a fascinating look at the process of boosting the sensor to 6K -- we were even able to snag an exclusive look inside the sacred space. Finally, Intel announced the next generation of its Thunderbolt interface, promising double the throughput and expanded 4K support. But those are just the highlights; check out our complete coverage after the break for the full rehash.

Filed under: ,

Comments

Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/4wuBANkVHC0/

Hurricane Sandy new jersey atlantic city ocean city maryland Nexus 7 KDKA Pumpkin Carving Ideas

Facebook Apologized to a Mom After Accidentally Banning Her Twice for Posting Breastfeeding Pictures

Facebook doesn't like boobs (even when they're just elbows) so much that it banned a mother from the social network for posting pictures of her breastfeeding her children. What's interesting is that Kemp's photos weren't especially revealing (in the explicit sense of the word) and that Facebook actually allows photos of breastfeeding to be posted. What's horrible is that Facebook banned her not once but twice for it. What happened? More »


Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/mNWeorVZxw8/facebook-apologized-to-a-mom-after-accidentally-banning-her-twice-for-posting-a-breastfeeding-picture

westminster dog show 2012 words with friends words with friends phlebotomy dog show best in show bret michaels

Vudu Headquarters Robbed, Hard Drives With Private Customer Data Stolen

vuduThere's been a break-in! And this time, it's a physical, real-world break-in ? not the digital variety we've grown accustomed to. Vudu, the video streaming service acquired by Walmart in 2010, has just sent an email to customers letting them know of a break-in that occurred in their Santa Clara, CA office on March 24th. While it appears that credit card info is mostly safe (Vudu says they never stored it), the thieves walked off with multiple hard drives containing data like customer names, encrypted passwords, addresses, and phone numbers.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/CV_naDNKa6g/

livan hernandez soledad o brien mega ball lottery winner lottery numbers mega millions lottery jackpot

Sunday, April 7, 2013

Jerusalem mayor shelves plan to name street after Yeshayahu Leibowitz

Jerusalem mayor Nir Barkat put the brakes on a motion to name a street in the city after controversial philosopher Yeshayahu Leibowitz on Thursday, following dissent by council members from right wing and religious parties.

The proposal to honor the outspoken intellectual, first raised a decade ago, had successfully passed two municipal naming committees and was supposed to receive final approval in the Thursday city council meeting, but then Likud councilman Elisha Peleg began reading out quotes by Leibowitz attacking Shas spiritual leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, raising the ire of the religious council members, and leading Barkat to remove the vote from the agenda.

Leibowitz, who managed to spark endless controversy during his years in the media spotlight ? regularly issuing provocative statements on the topics of ethics, religion, and politics ? carried on his legacy from the grave. Peleg said that the deceased Hebrew University professor and Israel Prize selectee ?must take responsibility for his irresponsible statements ? The man does not deserve to be memorialized in Jerusalem.?

While left-wing council members defended the decision to name a street after Leibowitz, one saying it was more of an honor for the city than the man, and another suggesting that if Leibowitz doesn?t deserve a street named after him than neither do the prophets Jeremiah and Isiah, who also suffered criticism and anger for their words, Barkat decided to postpone the vote until more council members were present and chances of the motion passing were increased.

Barkat?s office said the mayor was sure the motion would pass later this month.?If passed, the city will name one of the streets in the Givat Ram neighborhood, which is home to Israel?s Supreme Court, the Knesset, government ministries, the Israel Museum, and Hebrew University, after Leibowitz.

Source: http://www.timesofisrael.com/jerusalem-mayor-shelves-plan-to-name-street-after-yeshayahu-leibowitz/

ESPYs daniel tosh Jason Kidd All Star Game 2012 directv rashard lewis curacao

Flies model a potential sweet treatment for Parkinson's disease

Apr. 6, 2013 ? Researchers from Tel Aviv University describe experiments that could lead to a new approach for treating Parkinson's disease (PD) using a common sweetener, mannitol.

This research is presented today at the Genetics Society of America's 54th Annual Drosophila Research Conference in Washington D.C., April 3-7, 2013.

Mannitol is a sugar alcohol familiar as a component of sugar-free gum and candies. Originally isolated from flowering ash, mannitol is believed to have been the "manna" that rained down from the heavens in biblical times. Fungi, bacteria, algae, and plants make mannitol, but the human body can't. For most commercial uses it is extracted from seaweed although chemists can synthesize it. And it can be used for more than just a sweetener.

The Food and Drug Administration approved mannitol as an intravenous diuretic to flush out excess fluid. It also enables drugs to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), the tightly linked cells that form the walls of capillaries in the brain. The tight junctions holding together the cells of these tiniest blood vessels come slightly apart five minutes after an infusion of mannitol into the carotid artery, and they stay open for about 30 minutes.

Mannitol has another, less-explored talent: preventing a sticky protein called ?-synuclein from gumming up the substantia nigra part of the brains of people with PD and Lewy body dementia (LBD), which has similar symptoms to PD. In the disease state, the proteins first misfold, then form sheets that aggregate and then extend, forming gummy fibrils.

Certain biochemicals, called molecular chaperones, normally stabilize proteins and help them fold into their native three-dimensional forms, which are essential to their functions. Mannitol is a chemical chaperone. So like a delivery person who both opens the door and brings in the pizza, mannitol may be used to treat Parkinson's disease by getting into the brain and then restoring normal folding to ?-synuclein.

Daniel Segal, PhD, and colleagues at Tel Aviv University investigated the effects of mannitol on the brain by feeding it to fruit flies with a form of PD that has highly aggregated ?-synuclein.

The researchers used a "locomotion climbing assay" to study fly movement. Normal flies scamper right up the wall of a test tube, but flies whose brains are encumbered with ?-synuclein aggregates stay at the bottom, presumably because they can't move normally. The percentage of flies that climb one centimeter in 18 seconds assesses the effect of mannitol.

An experimental run tested flies daily for 27 days. After that time, 72% of normal flies climbed up, in comparison to 38% of the PD flies. Their lack of ascension up the sides of the test tube indicated "severe motor dysfunction."

In contrast, were flies bred to harbor the human mutant ?-synuclein gene, who as larvae feasted on mannitol that sweetened the medium at the bottoms of their vials. These flies fared much better -- 70% of them could climb after 27 days. And slices of their brains revealed a 70% decrease in accumulated misfolded protein compared to the brains of mutant flies raised on the regular medium lacking mannitol.

It's a long way from helping climbing-impaired flies to a new treatment for people, but the research suggests a possible novel therapeutic direction. Dr. Segal, however, cautioned that people with PD or similar movement disorders should not chew a ton of mannitol-sweetened gum or sweets; that will not help their current condition. The next step for researchers is to demonstrate a rescue effect in mice, similar to improved climbing by flies, in which a rolling drum ("rotarod") activity assesses mobility.

"Until and if mannitol is proven to be efficient for PD on its own, the more conservative and possibly more immediate use can be the conventional one, using it as a BBB disruptor to facilitate entrance of other approved drugs that have problems passing through the BBB," Dr. Segal said. A preliminary clinical trial of mannitol on a small number of volunteers might follow if results in mice support those seen in the flies, he added, but that is still many research steps away.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Genetics Society of America, via Newswise.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/~3/Tbahh3a8bWY/130407090737.htm

clippers lisa lampanelli lisa lampanelli bronx zoo memphis grizzlies celebrity apprentice grizzlies

All about immigration: Green cards? Citizenship?

WASHINGTON (AP) ? This may be the year Congress decides what to do about the millions of immigrants living illegally in the U.S. And this may be the week when a bipartisan group of senators makes public details of the overhaul plan it has been negotiating for months.

But what will that be? Why now? And who are all these immigrants, once you get past the big round numbers?

A big dose of facts, figures and other information to help understand the current debate over immigration:

___

WHY NOW?

Major problems with U.S. immigration have been around for decades.

President George W. Bush tried to change the system and failed. President Barack Obama promised to overhaul it in his first term but never did.

In his second term, he's making immigration a priority, and Republicans also appear ready to deal.

Why the new commitment?

Obama won 71 percent of Hispanic voters in his 2012 re-election campaign, and he owes them. Last year's election also sent a loud message to Republicans that they can't ignore this pivotal voting bloc.

It's been the kind of breathtaking turnaround you rarely see in politics. Plus, there's growing pressure from business leaders, who want to make it easier for the U.S. to attract highly educated immigrants and to legally bring in more lower-skilled workers such as farm laborers.

___

WHAT'S THE PROBLEM?

Talk about "comprehensive immigration reform" generally centers on four main questions:

?What to do about the 11 million-plus immigrants who live in the U.S. without legal permission.

?How to tighten border security.

?How to keep businesses from employing people who are in the U.S. illegally.

?How to improve the legal immigration system, now so convoluted that the adjective "Byzantine" pops up all too frequently.

___

WHAT'S THE GANG OF EIGHT?

A group of four Democrats and four Republicans in the Senate, taking the lead in trying to craft legislation that would address all four questions.

Obama is preparing his own plan as a backup in case congressional talks fail. There's also a bipartisan House group working on draft legislation, but House Republican leaders may leave it to the Senate to make the first move.

___

COMING TO AMERICA

A record 40.4 million immigrants live in the U.S., representing 13 percent of the population. More than 18 million are naturalized citizens, 11 million are legal permanent or temporary residents, and more than 11 million are in the country without legal permission, according to the Pew Hispanic Center, a private research organization.

Those in the U.S. illegally made up about 3.7 percent of the U.S. population in 2010. While overall immigration has steadily grown, the number of immigrants in the U.S. illegally peaked at 12 million in 2007.

___

WE'RE NO. 1

The U.S. is the leading destination for immigrants. Russia's second, with 12.3 million, according to Pew.

___

WHERE FROM?

Twenty-nine percent of the foreign-born in the U.S., or about 11.7 million people, came from Mexico. About 25 percent came from South and East Asia, 9 percent from the Caribbean, 8 percent from Central America, 7 percent South America, 4 percent the Middle East and the rest from elsewhere.

The figures are more lopsided for immigrants living here illegally: An estimated 58 percent are from Mexico. The next closest figure is 6 percent from El Salvador, says the government.

___

WHERE TO?

California has the largest share of the U.S. immigrant population, 27 percent, followed by New York, New Jersey, Florida, Nevada, Hawaii and Texas, according to the Migration Policy Institute, a private group focused on global immigration issues.

California has the largest share of immigrants in the U.S. illegally, at 25 percent, followed by Texas with 16 percent. Florida and New York each has 6 percent, and Georgia has 5 percent, according to the Department of Homeland Security.

___

GETTING IN

Here's one way to think about the ways immigrants arrive in the U.S: Some come in the front door, others the side door and still others the back door, as laid out in a report from the private Population Reference Bureau.

?Arriving through the front door: people legally sponsored by their families or employers. Also refugees and asylum-seekers, and immigrants who win visas in an annual "diversity" lottery.

?Side door: legal temporary arrivals, including those who get visas to visit, work or study. There are dozens of types of nonimmigrant visas, available to people ranging from business visitors to foreign athletes and entertainers. Visitors from dozens of countries don't even need visas.

?Back door: Somewhat more than half of those in the U.S. illegally have come in the back door, evading border controls, Pew estimates. The rest legally entered, but didn't leave when they were supposed to or otherwise violated terms of their visas.

___

HOW DO WE KNOW?

It's widely accepted that there are more than 11 million immigrants in the U.S. illegally.

But how do we know that?

Those who are living here without permission typically aren't eager to volunteer that information. Number-crunchers dig into census data and other government surveys, make some educated assumptions, adjust for people who may be left out, mix in population information from Mexico and tend to arrive at similar figures.

The Department of Homeland Security estimates there were 11.5 million immigrants living in the U.S. illegally in January 2011. Pew puts the number at 11.1 million as of March 2011.

Demographers use what's called the "residual" method to get their tally. They take estimates of the legal foreign-born population and subtract that number from the total foreign-born population. The remainder represents those who are living in the country without legal permission.

___

IS IT A CRIME?

Simply being in the United States in violation of immigration laws isn't, by itself, a crime; it's a civil violation.

Entering the country without permission is a misdemeanor criminal offense. Re-entering the country without authorization after being formally removed can be felony.

Pew estimates that a little less than half of immigrants who lack legal permission to live in the U.S. didn't enter the country illegally. They overstayed their visas, worked without authorization, dropped out of school or otherwise violated the conditions of their visas.

___

WHAT'S IN A NAME?

There are varying and strong opinions about how best to refer to the 11 million-plus people who are in the U.S. without legal permission.

Illegal immigrants?

Undocumented workers?

Unauthorized population?

Illegal aliens?

The last has generally fallen out of favor. Some immigrant advocates are pressing a "Drop the I-Word" campaign, arguing that it is dehumanizing to refer to people as "illegal."

"Undocumented worker" often isn't accurate because many aren't workers, and some have documents from other countries. Homeland Security reports refer to "unauthorized immigrants," but the agency also reports statistics on "aliens apprehended."

___

DEFINITIONS, PLEASE:

?Legal permanent residents (LPRs): people who have permission to live in the U.S. permanently but aren't citizens. They're also known as "green card" holders. Most of them can apply for citizenship within five years of getting green cards. In 2011, 1.06 million people got the cards.

?Refugees and asylees: people who come to the U.S. to avoid persecution in their home countries. What's the difference between the two terms? Refugees are people who apply for protective status before they get to the U.S. Asylees are people who apply upon arrival in the U.S. or later.

?Naturalization: The process by which immigrants become U.S. citizens.

___

GOING GREEN

Is there an actual green card? Indeed there is.

It's the Permanent Resident Card issued to people who are authorized to live and work in the U.S. on a permanent basis. In 2010, the government redesigned them to add new security features ? and make them green again.

The cards had been a variety of colors over the years. New green cards are good for 10 years for lawful permanent residents and two years for conditional residents.

___

PATH TO CITIZENSHIP

There's a lot of talk about creating a "path to citizenship" for immigrants who are in the U.S. without legal status. But there's no consensus on what the route should be, and some conservatives reject the idea outright, seeing it as tantamount to amnesty.

There is a vigorous debate over what conditions immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally should have to satisfy to get citizenship ? paying taxes or fees, passing background checks, etc.

Some Republicans want to first see improvements in border security and in tracking whether legal immigrants leave the country when required. Obama doesn't support linking the path to citizenship with border security.

Some conservatives want to grant immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally some sort of legal status that stops short of citizenship. Some 43 percent of Americans think those who are here illegally should be eligible for citizenship, one-quarter think they should only be allowed to apply for legal residency, and about the same share think they should not be allowed to stay legally at all, according to a Pew Research Center survey released in March.

___

A NEW ACRONYM

Move over LPRs; make way for LPIs.

The president's draft immigration proposal would create a "Lawful Prospective Immigrant" visa. It would allow those who are here illegally to become legal permanent residents within eight years if they met certain requirements such as a criminal background check. They could later be eligible to become U.S. citizens.

___

THE A-WORD

Nothing stirs up a hornet's nest like talk of amnesty for immigrants who are in the country illegally, although there's a lot of disagreement over how to define the term.

A 2007 effort to overhaul the immigration system, led by Bush, failed in part because Republicans were dismayed that it included a process to give otherwise law-abiding immigrants who were in the country illegally a chance to become citizens. Critics complained that would be offering amnesty.

All sides know it's not practical to talk about sending 11 million-plus people back to their countries of origin. So one big challenge this time is finding an acceptable way to resolve the status of those who are in the country illegally.

___

GETTING A REPRIEVE

While the larger immigration debate goes on, the government already is offering as many as 1.76 million immigrants who are in the country illegally a way to avoid deportation, at least for now.

Obama announced a program in June that puts off deportation for many people brought here as children. Applicants for the reprieve must have arrived before they turned 16, be younger than 31 now, be high school graduates or in school, or have served in the military. They can't have a serious criminal record or pose a threat to public safety or national security.

Applications for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program are averaging 3,300 a day. By mid-March, nearly 454,000 people had applied and more than 245,000 had been approved, with most of the rest still under consideration.

In some ways, the program closely tracks the failed DREAM Act, which would have given many young illegal immigrants a path to legal status. Obama's program doesn't give them legal status but it at least protects them from deportation for two years.

___

HISTORY: DOING THE WAVE

The U.S. is in its fourth and largest immigration wave.

First came the Colonial era, then an 1820-1870 influx of newcomers mostly from Northern and Western Europe. Most were Germans and Irish, but the gold rush and jobs on the transcontinental railroad also attracted Chinese immigrants.

In the 1870s, immigration declined due to economic problems and restrictive legislation.

The third wave, between 1881 and 1920, brought more than 23 million people to the U.S., mostly from Southern and Eastern Europe, aided by cheaper trans-Atlantic travel and lured by employers seeking workers.

Then came the Great Depression and more restrictive immigration laws, and immigration went into decline for decades.

The fourth wave, still underway, began in 1965 with the end of immigration limits based on nationality. Foreign-born people made up 1 in 20 residents of the U.S. in 1960; today, the figure is about 1 in 8.

___

HISTORY: HERE A LAW, THERE A LAW

Until the late 1800s, immigration was largely a free for all. Then came country-by-country limits. Since then, big changes in U.S. immigration law have helped produce big shifts in migration patterns.

Among the more notable laws:

?1965 Immigration and Nationality Act: Abolished country-by-country limits, established a new system that determined immigration preference based on family relationships and needed skills, and expanded the categories of family members who could enter without numerical limits.

?1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act: Legalized about 2.7 million immigrants living in the U.S. illegally, 84 percent of them from Mexico and Central America.

?1990 Immigration Act: Increased worldwide immigration limit to a "flexible cap" of 675,000 a year. The number can go higher in some years if there are unused visas available from the previous year.

?1996 Immigrant Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act. Expanded possible reasons for deporting people or ruling them ineligible to enter the U.S., expedited removal procedures, gave state and local police power to enforce immigration laws.

?Post-2001: In 2001, talk percolated about a new immigration plan to deal with unauthorized immigrants, guest workers and violence along the Mexican border. But the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks of 2001 put an end to that, amid growing unease over illegal immigration.

___

ABOUT LAST TIME. ...

The last big immigration legalization plan, in 1986, took six years to get done.

The law, signed by President Ronald Reagan, had three main components: making it illegal to hire unauthorized workers, improving border enforcement and providing for the legalization of a big chunk of the estimated 3 million to 5 million immigrants then in the country illegally.

The results were disappointing on two central fronts: The hiring crackdown largely failed because there was no good way to verify eligibility to work, and it took a decade to improve border security. As a result, illegal immigration continued to grow, fueled by the strong U.S. economy.

What did work as intended: Close to 3 million immigrants living in the U.S. without permission received legal status. By 2009, about 40 percent of them had been naturalized, according to Homeland Security.

___

LATINOS RISING

Census figures show that between 1960 and 2010, immigration from Europe declined while the numbers coming from Latin America and Asia took off. As the immigrants' points of origin changed, so did their destinations. Concentrations shifted from the Northeast and Midwest to the South and West.

A few Census Bureau snapshots:

?In 1960, there were fewer than 1 million people in the U.S. who were born in Latin America. By 2010, there were 21.2 million.

?In 1960, 75 percent of foreigners in the U.S. came from Europe. By 2010, 80 percent came from Latin America and Asia.

?In 1960: 47 percent of the foreign-born lived in the Northeast and 10 percent in the South. By 2010, 22 percent lived in the Northeast and 32 percent in the South.

___

THE FENCE

The fence between the U.S. and Mexico runs off and on for 651 miles along the 1,954-mile border. Most of it has been built since 2005. At some points, it's an 18-foot-high steel mesh structure topped with razor wire. At others, it's a rusting, 8-foot-high thing, made of Army surplus landing mats from the Vietnam War.

The fencing is one of the more visible manifestations of a massive effort over the past two decades to improve border security. The results of that effort are dramatic. Those images of crowds of immigrants sprinting across the border illegally while agents scramble to nab a few are largely a thing of the past.

Two decades ago, fewer than 4,000 Border Patrol agents worked along the Southwest border. Today there are 18,500.

Plummeting apprehension statistics are one measure of change: 357,000 last year, compared with 1.6 million in 2000. The numbers are down in part because fewer are trying to make it across.

The border isn't sealed but it is certainly more secure.

___

WHO'S HANGING AROUND

With tighter border security and years of economic difficulty in the U.S., it turns out that most of the immigrants who are in the U.S. without permission have been there for a while. Just 14 percent have arrived since the start of 2005, according to Homeland Security estimates. In contrast, 29 percent came during the previous five years.

At the peak in 2000, about 770,000 immigrants arrived annually from Mexico, most of them entering the country illegally. By 2010, the pace had dropped to about 140,000, most of them arriving as legal immigrants, according to Pew.

___

WHO'S LEAVING?

Mexicans, mostly. Since 1986, more than 4 million noncitizens have been deported. Deportations have expanded in the Obama administration, reaching 410,000 in 2012 from 30,000 in 1990. Most of those deported ? 75 percent ? are sent back to Mexico. Nearly half of those removed had prior criminal convictions. So far, the Obama administration has deported more than 1.6 million people.

___

TO NATURALIZE OR NOT

Lots of U.S. immigrants who are eligible to become naturalized citizens don't bother. As of 2010, about two-thirds of eligible immigrants had applied for citizenship, according to the Migration Policy Institute. That lags behind the rate in other English-speaking countries such as Australia and Canada, which do more to promote naturalization.

___

WHY BOTHER?

What's so great about citizenship?

Naturalization offers all sorts of rights and benefits, including the right to vote and run for office. Naturalized citizens are protected from losing their residency rights and being deported if they get in legal trouble. They can bring family members into the U.S. more quickly.

Certain government jobs and licensed professions require citizenship. Citizenship also symbolizes full membership in U.S. society.

In 2010, there was a 67 percent earnings gap between naturalized citizens and noncitizen immigrants, according to a report from the Migration Policy Institute. Even after stripping out differences in education, language skills and work experience, naturalized citizens earned at least 5 percent more.

___

SKIPPING IT

Nearly two-thirds of the 5.4 million legal immigrants from Mexico who are eligible to become U.S. citizens haven't done so, according to a Pew study released in February. Their rate of naturalization is half that of legal immigrants from all other countries combined. The barriers to naturalization cited by Mexican nonapplicants include the need to learn English, the difficulty of the citizenship exam and the $680 application fee.

___

WORKERS

How do immigrants who are in the U.S. without permission fit into the nation's jobs picture?

In 2010, about 8 million were working in the U.S. or trying to get work. They made up about 5 percent of the labor force, according to Pew. Among U.S. farm workers, about half are believed to be in the country illegally, according to the Government Accountability Office.

Business groups want a system to legally bring in both more highly skilled workers and more lower-skilled workers such as agricultural laborers. The idea is to hire more when Americans aren't available to fill jobs. This has been a sticking point in past attempts at immigration overhaul. Labor groups want any such revamped system to provide worker protections and guard against displacing American workers. Current temporary worker programs are cumbersome and outdated.

___

EMPLOYERS

Current law requires employers to have their workers fill out a form that declares them authorized to work in the U.S. Then the employer needs to verify that the worker's identifying documents look real. But the law allows lots of different documents, and many of them are easy to counterfeit.

The government has developed a mostly voluntary employment verification system called E-Verify, which has gradually gotten better. But so far just 10 percent of employers are using it, according to the Migration Policy Institute. The system is now required in varying degrees by 19 states.

___

FAMILIES VS. JOBS

A big question in the immigration debate centers on how much priority to give to the family members of U.S. citizens and permanent residents.

Under current law, the U.S. awards a much larger proportion of green cards to family members than to foreigners with job prospects here. About two-thirds of permanent legal immigration to the U.S. is family-based, compared with about 15 percent that is employment-based, according to the Migration Policy Institute. The rest is largely humanitarian.

Some policymakers think employment-based immigration should be boosted to help the economy. Advocates for families want to make sure any such action doesn't come at the expense of people seeking to join relatives in the U.S.

___

WHO CARES?

For all the attention being devoted to immigration right now, it's not the top priority for most people, even for most Hispanics. It ranked 17th on a list of policy priorities in a recent Pew Research Center poll. Among Hispanics, one-third said immigration was an extremely important issue to them, behind such issues as the economy and jobs, education and health care.

___

WHAT TO DO?

The public is divided on what should be done to fix immigration problems. In a recent Pew survey, 28 percent said the priority should be tighter restrictions on immigration, 27 percent said creating a path to citizenship, and 42 percent thought both approaches should get equal priority.

___

A VIEW FROM THE SOUTH

Is life actually better in the U.S.? A little more than half of Mexican adults think so, according to a 2012 Pew Global Attitudes poll. Thirty-eight percent said they'd move to the U.S. if they had the chance. Nineteen percent said they'd come even without authorization.

___

Sources: Pew Hispanic Center, Migration Policy Institute, Department of Homeland Security, Census Bureau, Government Accountability Office, Population Reference Bureau, Encyclopedia of Immigration.

___

Associated Press writers Alicia Caldwell and Erica Werner contributed to this report.

___

Follow Nancy Benac on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/nbenac

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-green-cards-citizenship-121159749.html

yellow cab dropkick murphys guernsey colcannon dystonia tourettes rosie o donnell

Saturday, April 6, 2013

Syria warns Jordan over aiding rebels

AMMAN, Jordan (AP) ? Syria's regime sternly warned neighboring Jordan on Thursday that it was "playing with fire" by allowing the U.S. and other countries to train and arm rebels on its territory.

Jordan, America's closest ally in the Arab world, has long been nervous that President Bashar Assad's hard-line regime could retaliate for supporting the rebels. The warning carried on state media may add to those jitters, though Jordanian government officials publicly downplayed it as "mere speculation by the Syrian media."

Syrian state television said leaks in U.S. media show Jordan "has a hand in training terrorists and then facilitating their entry into Syria." State radio accused Jordan of "playing with fire."

A front-page editorial in the government daily al-Thawra accused Amman of adopting a policy of "ambiguity" by training the rebels while at the same time publicly insisting on a "political solution" to the Syrian crisis.

"Jordan's attempt to put out the flame from the leaked information will not help as it continues with its mysterious policy, which brings it closer to the volcanic crater," the paper said.

Two Jordanian officials downplayed the diplomatic tiff with Syria. One said Jordan will not discuss the state of relations through the media.

"Such discussions are usually carried out through the appropriate diplomatic channels,' he said. Both officials insisted on anonymity out of concern that their comments may further irritate relations, which have been historically bumpy.

Jordan has long been concerned that the Assad regime could use chemical weapons against it, or that agents linked to the regime or its allied Lebanese militant group Hezbollah could attack the kingdom.

The Syrian warnings appeared to reflect the regime's concerns about statements by U.S. and other Western and Arab officials saying Jordan has been facilitating arms shipments and hosting training camps for Syrian rebels since last October.

The training and the influx of foreign-funded weapons have coincided with rebel gains in southern Syria near the strategic border area with Jordan.

Those gains could be leading up to control of the region along the Jordanian border. That would be a major victory that could offer rebels a staging ground to try to attack the capital Damascus, the seat of Assad's power.

Rebels already control large swathes of territory in northern Syria along the Turkish border.

Activists reported more advances in the south on Thursday.

The rebels receiving training in Jordan are mainly secular Sunni Muslim tribesmen from central and southern Syria who once served in the army and police.

The force is expected to fill a security vacuum ? mainly to protect the border with Jordan, assist displaced Syrians and possibly set up a safe haven for refugees ? if Assad is toppled.

The Syrians training in Jordan are also envisioned as a counterbalance to the Islamic militant groups that have proven to be among the most effective of the myriad rebel factions fighting Assad's forces on the ground.

Chief among those rebel extremist groups is Jabhat al-Nusra or the Nusra Front, which the U.S. designates as a terrorist group and says is associated with al-Qaida.

The prominence of such extremist groups has fueled fears in Jordan that the chaos in Syria could lead to a failed state where Islamic militants have a free hand.

Israel and the United States also are concerned about militants potentially operating in the area near the Israeli frontier with Syria in the Golan Heights ? also in the south ? should Assad's regime collapse.

Though Jordan is supporting one segment of the disparate patchwork of rebel groups, it is nevertheless concerned about the recent rebel advances in the south along its border.

One fear is that the fall of the area into rebel hands could unleash lawlessness on the border and provide a haven for Islamic extremist groups such as Nusra Front on its doorstep.

The Islamist rebel groups, particularly Nusra, are complicating the battlefield by thwarting much-needed international aid from countries such as the U.S. that do not want to bolster extremist, jihadi groups.

In the latest fighting in the south, the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said fighters seized most parts of Karak neighborhood in the province of Daraa after several days of fighting.

Daraa province borders Jordan and its provincial capital of the same name was the birthplace of the uprising against Assad two years ago.

There were also heavy clashes reported in the town of Sheik Maskeen, which is on the route from the Jordanian capital Amman to Damascus. Daraa is 115 kilometers (71 miles) south of Damascus.

The Observatory, an anti-regime activist group, also reported clashes at a checkpoint outside a camp for displaced Syrians on the outskirts of the city of Daraa. It said rockets fell inside the camp, but did not say who fired them, or how many people died.

On Wednesday, opposition fighters captured a military base outside the city of Daraa. That victory followed the rebel takeover of Dael, one of the province's bigger towns, and another air defense base in the area late last month.

Their aim is to secure a corridor from the Jordanian border to Damascus in preparation for an eventual assault on the capital. And they have made major progress along the way. Activists say several towns and villages along the Daraa-Damascus route are now in rebel hands.

It is widely believed that the rebels are close to seizing control of the two border posts with Jordan ? a significant gain that would bolster arms shipments to the rebels.

In comments distributed Thursday, Assad criticized the recent Arab League decision to give Syria's seat to the opposition, calling it "meaningless theatre."

"This League needs legitimacy itself. It cannot grant legitimacy to others nor withdraw it," he said in an interview with Turkey's TV channel Ulusal Kanal. Excerpts of which were published Wednesday and Thursday and the full interview will be aired Friday.

___

Associated Press writer Albert Aji contributed to this report from Damascus, Syria.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/syria-warns-jordan-over-aiding-rebels-153846295.html

colbert report legionnaires disease underwear bomber unclaimed money godspell media matters hana

Friday, April 5, 2013

Sahara Went from Green to Desert in a Flash

From lakes and grasslands with hippos and giraffes to a vast desert, North Africa's sudden geographical transformation 5,000 years ago was one of the planet's most dramatic climate shifts.

The transformation took place nearly simultaneously across the continent's northern half, a new study finds. The results will appear in an upcoming issue of the journal Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

The findings come from analyses of dust blown west from Africa and dropped into the Atlantic Ocean. Researchers sifted through 30,000 years of dust and ocean bottom muck retrieved with ocean drilling ships. The changing levels of windblown dust in the ocean sediments provide scientists with clues to Africa's climate and how it has changed over time. Simply put, a lot of dust means drier conditions and less dust means a wetter environment.

The wet period, called the African Humid Period, started and ended suddenly, confirming previous studies by other groups, the sediments revealed. However, toward the Humid Period's end about 6,000 years ago, the dust was at about 20 percent of today's level, far less dusty than previous estimates, the study found.

The study may give scientists a better understanding of how changing dust levels relate to climate by providing inputs for climate models, David McGee, an MIT paleoclimatologist and lead study author, said in a statement. Sahara desert dust dominates modern-day ocean sediments off the African coast, and it can travel in the atmosphere all the way to North America.

McGee and his colleagues are now testing whether the dust measurements can resolve a long-standing problem: the inability of climate models to reproduce the magnitude of wet conditions in North Africa 6,000 years ago.

Email Becky Oskin or follow her @beckyoskin. Follow us?@OAPlanet, Facebook?or Google+. Original article on LiveScience's OurAmazingPlanet.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/sahara-went-green-desert-flash-201202231.html

silent house nfl mock draft project m colts colts big ten tournament 2012 dennis quaid

Booker T. Washington was born a slave on April 5, 1856. He later became the most...

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://www.facebook.com/libraryofcongress/posts/111061129064124

30 rock What Time Is The Super Bowl 2013 Super Bowl 2013 Time BlackBerry 10 superbowl jackie robinson Ron Jeremy

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Oops! Sorry! Another Obamacare Goal Missed: Small Businesses ...

RUSH:? When was it, last week, Thursday or Friday, that I said that everything happening confused me? ? I forget what day it was last week.? Well, today everything is boring me.? Everything in the world, and I don't care about any of it today.? I'm not supposed to tell you that, by the way.? That goes against every media broadcast principle that there is.? I'm just supposed to do it and let you wonder if I'm bored.? I'm not supposed to admit it.? But it is what it is.?

If you look real hard today in the back of the front section of the New York Times, you'll find a story on Obamacare, which is where a lot of the stories on Obamacare are now in the New York Times. Hard to find, because the news on Obamacare isn't all that good.? Here's another one, and the headline of this story:? "Small Firms' Offer of Plan Choices Under Health Law Delayed."

And here's the crux of it.? "Unable to meet tight deadlines in the new health care law, the Obama administration is delaying parts of a program intended to provide affordable health insurance to small businesses and their employees -- a major selling point for the health care legislation." They're unable to meet the deadline of implementation.? The law requires it to be implemented next year starting in January, and they're not gonna make it.? It's just now April of 2013, and they're not gonna make January of '14.?

Unable to meet tight deadlines in the new health care law, which they wrote, the regime "is delaying parts of a program intended to provide affordable health insurance to small businesses and their employees. ... The law calls for a new insurance marketplace specifically for small businesses, starting next year. But in most states, employers will not be able to get what Congress intended: the option to provide workers with a choice of health plans. They will instead be limited to a single plan."

That much-touted choice, the much-touted flexibility which was the way that they were gonna lower costs.? "Oops, sorry, we're behind."? That isn't happening.? We're not gonna be able to get that done until 2015.? "The choice option, already available to many big businesses, was supposed to become available to small employers in January. But administration officials said they would delay it until 2015 in the 33 states where the federal government will be running insurance markets known as exchanges."? Those states refuse to do the exchanges, so the government's gotta come in and do it, and they're not set up for that.? There's no provision for the federal government to run an exchange in one state, much less 27 of 'em.?

"The promise of affordable health insurance for small businesses was portrayed as a major advantage of the new health care law, mentioned often by White House officials and Democratic leaders in Congress as they fought opponents of the legislation." This was a major selling point.? This was the reason we had to do it, and we had to do it now because it was gonna affect so many people, small businesses and their employees.? But now the regime is unable to meet the tight deadlines, and so they just decided that they're gonna move the requirement from January of 2014 to sometime in 2015.?

Now, you'll remember, as I recall for you, this provision, all of these choices for small businesses and their employers, which were going to offer the opportunity for lower prices, this was the provision that was required to get Mary Landrieu's vote for Obamacare.? This was a specific provision promised to her, required by her based on concerns that she raised.? But it's not just her.? There were a lot of people who were assured and promised that health care was gonna be cheaper, it was gonna be filled with more choice, and the small business specifically here was cited as -- I mean, this is a major, major element of Obamacare.?

So people are starting to ask a question.? "Well, look, if this isn't gonna be ready in time and if that's not gonna be ready in time and if that's not gonna be ready in time, why don't we just delay the implementation of this for a full year, every aspect of it, why do this piecemeal?"? And the answer to that is -- even though I don't care today -- the answer to that is that the Democrats don't want this kind of failure going into the midterm elections or the presidential election.? They don't want it.? That's why 2015 is sort of a drop-dead date to get as much of this implemented -- well, 2014 was actually the target year.? They're not gonna make that now.? And this is a huge, huge provision here.?

By the way, this isn't gonna matter, nobody's gonna say anything, nobody's gonna do anything about it, but they do not have independently the authority to delay this on their own.? They've gotta go get approval and votes to move this.? It's another aspect of the law that's just gonna be ignored, but they do not have -- and it's written in the legislation -- they do not have, the regime just can't say, "You know what, we're gonna delay that a year."? They'll get away with it like they get away with everything else, but statutorily they don't have the right or the freedom, or what have you, to do that.

But you'll notice now, the New York Times health care news is always in the back of the front section, because it's always bad news.? It's always, for the most part, news about all the problems with Obamacare.? And I think I said last week and a number of people have said this, this thing, folks, is so massive, it is so big, it is so unruly.? Remember my analogy?? I was watching a fascinating BBC show called The Challenger, and it was about the official investigation into what caused the Challenger explosion in 1986.? And there's a scene where two of the primary characters are driving to the Pentagon for a demonstration. An Air Force general is showing a physicist some secret stuff about the solid rocket boosters as they're trying to steer him to the cause that they know but that they can't be part of revealing.?

The show has not aired in America.? It's only aired on the BBC.? It stars I think William Hurt, who plays the physicist, Dr. Richard Feynman, who's no longer alive. He was one of the few civilians on the official commission to investigate what happened.? And as we all know now, the O-rings were not tolerant of cold temperatures and they were not properly tested and it was unusually cold the morning of that launch. The O-rings, think of rubber that has to expand and fill gaps. It hardened, it didn't expand, and so flames escaped what should have been tight enclosures, the thing blew up.?

Well, they were caught.? They wanted to tell everybody what happened, but they couldn't reveal national security secrets at the same time.? Sally Ride, an astronaut, she was on the commission, the late Sally Ride, and an Air Force general who knew what happened.? They knew that the O-rings blew up, but Morton-Thiokol, the manufacturers, were trying to cover it up, obviously, a lot of people were.? So they were trying to steer Feynman, the physicist, to the answer that he would conclude on his own as far as anybody else thought, the O-ring problem.? And really what it boiled down to was the reason why they didn't want to make any of it public is because what they were ultimately telling the world was that the United States could not launch military payloads of any kind in weather below 50 degrees.?

It's 1986.? That would have been overwhelmingly valuable to somebody like the Soviet Union, or the ChiComs.? So they were caught between a rock and a hard place.? They wanted everybody to know. They wanted to be public. It was the Reagan administration, they didn't want to cover anything up, but at the same time they had a secret that they needed to protect for national security.? Anyway, in this show, it's about 90 minutes, maybe two hours, they're driving the Pentagon, a thought struck me.? Because they had an aerial view of the Pentagon and these two guys are driving in, and the Air Force general is gonna give Dr. Feynman a slideshow presentation that will not conclude anything, but Feynman's supposed to get the picture on his own without anybody actually telling him.?

And I got to thinking, is there anybody, is there any single individual alive who knows everything going on at the Pentagon today, tomorrow, right now, next week?? And, of course, the logical answer is "no."? But stop and think about that.? The Pentagon is national defense.? The Pentagon is the defense of the people of this country, the Constitution, and there are things going on in there.? I'm not talking about conspiracies.? I'm just talking about massive bureaucracies. There are things going on in there that nobody knows.? The president doesn't know everything going on in there, the secretary of defense doesn't know.?

By definition, some things have to be kept secret from everybody.? What is it that keeps everybody in there from going rogue, with so many people doing things that not one single person can know?? And it struck me that health care is the same.? In fact, I once ran into a former director of central intelligence, CIA director, and I said, "Were you aware of everything the agency was doing?"?

"No, it's impossible."?

I have a very distorted, immature -- not immature -- naive view of chief executives.? In my estimation, they know everything.? CEO of Exxon, I've always thought, knows everything going on there.? He doesn't, but I've always thought that a CEO did.? He obviously has to delegate, but in terms of knowledge.? But the CIA director, the ex-CIA director, "No, I can't possibly tell you everything going on in here."? I know that that's intellectually true.? It still shocks me, because everybody in there is following orders.? Somebody's giving 'em.?

Health care's the same thing, folks.? This thing is so open-ended with so many people in charge of it, the areas of Obamacare in the law itself where you'll find the phrase "as the secretary shall determine."? The number of times that phrase appears is almost too many to count.? So here you have the implementation of one aspect of this law, which is not gonna be made on time, central aspect of it, small business, the businesses and their employees, but the number of regulations added to this legislation every day even now number in the thousands of pages.? It's simply not possible for any one person to understand health care in this country.?

And what is health care?? You go to the doctor when you're not feeling well.? If you need surgery, you go to the hospital for an operation.? We've turned that into something so complicated that our way of dealing with it is inexplicable to people.? So now we've got this provision, these state exchanges... you wait. You know our call yesterday afternoon, what was her name from Tampa?? The expert on SSDI and all these other -- what was her name?? She's probably gonna get closer to finding out how to scam the health care system than anybody actually in charge of it.? She's already figured out SSDI, SSI, the food stamp program, how to manage your prescriptions from one day to the next so that people don't figure out you're getting them every day.? It's amazing.?

If you missed that call, we've got it at RushLimbaugh.com.? In fact, Snerdley, I had people e-mail me yesterday saying it was the funniest thing they ever saw.? They said, "Watching it on the Dittocam," I didn't look at it, people said, "You shoulda seen you.? The visuals of you reacting to that woman are priceless.? Ellen from Clearwater.? Clearwater, Tampa, same difference.? But I'm serious, folks, something as routine as you get sick, you need to go to the doctor, it's become something incomprehensible.? Nobody can explain how this is gonna get done and how it's gonna get paid for, and just the simple procedure of you getting sick and needing to go to the doctor is gonna become one of the most complicated things in everybody's life that nobody's gonna be able to explain.? And, in its own way, it's a microcosm of what interacting with the government on anything is becoming.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: We've ripped up the greatest health care system in the world. We've replaced it with something that isn't even implementable, and now the implementation of what isn't workable has been delayed.? That isn't gonna work.? Obamacare was never, never, ever gonna work.? We just get more and more evidence of this each and every day.??

Source: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/04/02/oops_sorry_another_obamacare_goal_missed_small_businesses_won_t_have_a_choice_option

melissa gilbert deadliest catch dwts sean hannity bobby petrino fired buffett rule lollapalooza lineup